Monday, October 31, 2005

National Arbitration Forum Issues Decision on Football Great Emmitt Smith's Web Address

National Arbitration Forum Issues Decision on Football Great Emmitt Smith's Web Address

A National Arbitration Forum arbitrator rules in favor of Emmitt Smith regarding the Internet domain name emmittsmith.com.

MINNEAPOLIS, Oct. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- The National Arbitration Forum announced today that a ruling has been issued in favor of former Dallas Cowboy and all-time NFL rushing yards leader Emmitt Smith regarding the rights to emmittsmith.com.

The National Arbitration Forum received an electronic complaint on September 8, 2005 from Emmitt Smith III, represented by John A. Thomas, of Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C., asserting legal rights to the domain name emmittsmith.com. The address was registered by the Respondent, EMMITSMITH.com c/o Whois IDentity Shield, of Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 17, 2001. It redirected Internet users to a commercial website featuring links to third- party businesses unrelated to Emmitt Smith.

National Arbitration Forum arbitrator Tyrus R. Atkinson, Jr. ruled in favor of Emmitt Smith. The arbitrator determined that Smith possesses common law rights in his name based on the fame and reputation associated with his NFL career, and that the Web address emmittsmith.com was "confusingly similar" to Smith's name. Atkinson also found that the Respondent did not have legitimate rights to, or interest in, the disputed Web address and was using the address in bad faith presumably earning commissions for redirecting Internet traffic to third-party commercial sites.

During the course of the proceedings, the Respondent's registration of the domain name emmittsmith.com was either deleted or expired, prompting Smith to redeem the domain name under the new Expired Domain Deletion Policy (EDDP) of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). This was the first decision issued by the National Arbitration Forum utilizing the EDDP.

The National Arbitration Forum hears thousands of disputes every year that are similar to that of Emmitt Smith. The domain name dispute process is a popular alternative to lengthy and expensive trademark lawsuits.

The National Arbitration Forum website provides a copy of the decision, Emmitt J. Smith, III v. EMMITTSMITH.COM c/o Whois IDentity Shield, at: http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/555486.htm.

For more information about National Arbitration Forum and to access its Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) newsletter, visit http://arbitration-forum.blogspot.com/

About the National Arbitration Forum

The National Arbitration Forum is one of the world's leading providers of alternative dispute resolution solutions, including arbitration and mediation, representing a distinguished panel of over 1,500 attorneys and retired judges in the U.S. and in 29 countries. Founded in 1986, the National Arbitration Forum administers more than 50,000 cases annually. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the National Arbitration Forum also has offices located in New Jersey and Los Angeles. The National Arbitration Forum also publishes an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) newsletter and blog (http://arbitration-forum.blogspot.com/). Additional information is available at the National Arbitration Forum's website at http://www.arbitration-forum.com/ .

Source: National Arbitration Forum

CONTACT: Kimberly Johnson of National Arbitration Forum, +1-952-516-6478,
kjohnson@arb-forum.com

Web site: http://www.arbitration-forum.com/

Friday, October 28, 2005

National Arbitration Forum Issues Decision on Yahoo! Web Addresses

 
National Arbitration Forum Issues Decision on Yahoo! Web Addresses

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN (PRWEB) October 4, 2005 -- The National Arbitration Forum (http://www.arb-forum.com) announced today that a ruling has been issued in favor of Yahoo! regarding the rights to 54 Internet domain names, including homepageyahoo.com, yahoocalendar.com, and fantasysports-yahoo.com, among others. This is the latest in a series of claims that Yahoo! has won in defending its brand and name.

Yahoo! Inc., represented by David M. Kelly of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., filed a complaint electronically with the National Arbitration Forum on August 5, 2005 asserting legal rights to the Web addresses bearing close resemblance to those owned by Yahoo! Inc.

Having received no response from the Respondent, Bill Edwards a/k/a 1Ssteriods.com, to the complaint, National Arbitration Forum arbitrator Carolyn Marks Johnson found in favor of Yahoo! Inc. Bill Edwards a/k/a 1Ssteriods.com registered the disputed domain names between February 2002 and January 2005. Yahoo! Inc.’s trademark has three registrations with United States Patent and Trademark Office dating back to February 1997. The disputed domains resolve to the Respondent’s websites, which offer links to third-party sites featuring services that compete with Yahoo!’s business.

The National Arbitration Forum arbitrator found that Bill Edwards a/k/a 1Ssteriods.com did not have legitimate rights to, or interest in, the disputed Web addresses, and that the Web addresses were confusingly similar to Yahoo!’s trademark. The arbitrator also found that Bill Edwards a/k/a 1Ssteriods.com was using the addresses in bad faith by presumably profiting from “click-through” fees for diverting Internet users to third-party commercial websites.

Thousands of Internet domain disputes similar to those of Yahoo! are heard each year by the National Arbitration Forum under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The domain name dispute process is a popular alternative to lengthy and expensive trademark lawsuits.

A copy of the decision, Yahoo! Inc. v. Bill Edwards a/k/a 1Ssteriods.com (Claim Number: FA0508000535429) , is available for viewing on the National Arbitration Forum Web site at: http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/535429.htm.

About the National Arbitration Forum
The National Arbitration Forum is one of the world's leading providers of alternative dispute resolution solutions, including arbitration and mediation, representing a distinguished panel of over 1,500 attorneys and retired judges in the U.S. and in 29 countries. Founded in 1986, the National Arbitration Forum administers more than 50,000 cases annually. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the National Arbitration Forum also has offices located in New Jersey and Los Angeles. Additional information is available at the National Arbitration Forum's Web site at http://www.arbitration-forum.com

###

Press Contact: Kimberly Johnson
Company Name: NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
Email: kjohnson@arb-forum.com
Phone: 952.516.6478
Website: http://www.arbitration-forum.com

Thursday, October 27, 2005

Fakhimi & Associates Files Suit Against Monarch Health Care

 
Fakhimi & Associates Files Suit Against Monarch Health Care, a Medical Group Inc. on Behalf of Three Doctors and the General Public

(PRWEB) October 6, 2005 -- Law offices of Fakhimi & Associates, a boutique litigation firm in Santa Ana, California has filed a civil complaint against Monarch Medical Group in the Orange County Superior Court.

Among other claims, the Compliant filed on behalf of Howard Cheng, M.D, Minch Fong, M.D. and David Ukon, M.D. alleges that Monarch has a policy of refusing to pay medical providers which terminate their relations with Monarch for the last two months of their services. The Complaint ( case number 05CC10885) further alleges that Monarch does not account for the moneys not paid to terminating physicians when it calculates the "pool" numbers for the rest of the practitioners who are still in the pool. Named plaintiffs in the lawsuit are also stating a claim under California's Unfair Trade Practices statue, B & P. Code section 17200 on behalf of the general public and asking the court to issue an injunction preventing Monarch from actions stated in the Complaint.

Commenting about these allegations, Houman Fakhimi of Fakhimi & Associates said, "We look forward to vigorously representing our client and obtaining the remedies to which they are entitled to under the law."

About Fakhimi & Associates
Fakhimi & Associates is a full services litigation firm located in Santa Ana, California and serving the entire Southern California community. For more information call (714) 542-2188 or visit the firm website at http:/www.fakhimi.com.

# # #

Press Contact: Houman Fakhimi
Company Name: FAKHIMI & ASSOCIATES
Email: hfakhimi@lawhf.com
Phone: 714-542-2188
Website: www.fakhimi.com

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

New Divorce & Family Law Blog by Phoenix, Arizona Law Firm Launched

New blog by Arizona attorney helps answer questions and comments on legal issues
 
September 27, 2005 - Phoenix, Arizona - Managing Partner Trent Wilcox of Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. announces the release of a new blog, Arizona Divorce and Family Law (www.arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com). The new blog answers commonly asked questions about Arizona family law, addresses current Arizona family law topics, including divorce, custody, child support, spousal maintenance (alimony) and offers insight into other commonly litigated issues.

Blogs, officially weblogs, are also known as "blawgs" when targeting legal issues. Blogs are easier to update and thus to keep current. Frequent posting by Mr. Wilcox helps keep things fresh and also ensures that a wide variety of topics are covered. Links to other resources will be provided so readers can find answers to their unanswered questions.

"Arizona Divorce and Family Law provides another resource available to the public when dealing with the courts, a divorce or other legal issues. Many people cannot afford to hire an attorney and there is a need to have common legal questions answered. Arizona Divorce & Family Law is a good place to start," says Mr. Wilcox, "Although everyone’s case is different and there are other resources out there, this blog provides a jumping off point for further discussions with a lawyer."

Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. is a central Phoenix law firm. Three attorneys at the firm focus their practice on divorce and family law issues.
 
CONTACT INFORMATION

Monday, October 24, 2005

Redzee.com, Redzeeguru.com, LP keywords, and related sites to avoid.

This company seems to have morphed into another version selling the same kind of keyword bidding that is only available to browsers who have chosen to "upgrade" their browser and become infested with something they were not aware of, and may not want. They also sucker people in with a free toolbar.
 
If you are looking for information on one of these sites, you may be interested that all of these are hosted on the same server and also connected with www.webwisemedia.com and www.redzee.com.
 
 
Other words of interest are LP, LP Keywords, browser upgrades, browser upgrade, wise media, natural keyword positioning technology, browser add-ins.

Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Warning: Beware of installing "Secure Service Pack" on your computer

Warning: Beware of installing "Secure Service Pack" on your computer
 
Unless you know and understand what the "Secure Service Pack" actually consists of, we strongly recommend against installing it or anything that may popup and ask for permission from you to install it. Just because you have some trust in the site you are visiting does not mean you need or want what is being offered. If you are concerned about the security of your computer, only install things from the manufacturer's site, or the creator of your computer's operating system.
 
By the time you read this, "Secure Service Pack" may be called something else, so don't be fooled. Our understanding of this item is that it installs software that changes how your browser functions and you may or may not like what it does. You may be able to un-install it once you realize it's there, but do you want to trust something that will not even tell you what it is?
 
"Secure Service Pack" sounds like it's a Microsoft Service Pack that will upgrade your software, but in fact the software is designed to deliver advertisements in the form of web sites that you may be interested in. Part of the "benefit" of this software is to let you just type in keywords and not URLs to find sites. What they don't tell you is that they only sites they show you are paid advertisements and may or may not be what you are looking for, and might not even be a good site if they do have what you are looking for. It's the same old "Keyword browsing" scam that has been around for years. It's pure crap and should be avoided at all costs. Seriously!
 
I have seen at least one page that has a number of browser plug-ins and says " This page contains links to the Windows Authenticode family of plugins for Internet Explorer". If you want to upgrade your Internet Explorer, go to the Microsoft site and make sure you are getting the real deal.
 
Again, if you don't know for sure what you are installing, don't just trust the name of the application that you see, since it could be a trick and your anti-virus and anti-spyware programs WILL NOT PROTECT YOU OR WARN YOU!!
 
(hris

Legal Matters Client Newsletters Now Available for Real Estate Lawyers

Legal Matters Client Newsletters Now Available for Real Estate Lawyers

BOSTON, Oct. 18 /PRNewswire/ -- Real estate lawyers around the country can now use Legal Matters -- high-quality personalized client newsletters -- to easily and effectively market their practices.

Lawyers Weekly Publications recently launched a real estate version of the newsletters to help lawyers in this booming practice area keep in touch with clients and prompt new business and referrals.

Lawyers Weekly also offers versions geared to estate planning, family law, personal injury (in English and Spanish), employment law, and general practice.

Lawyers can mail the quarterly Legal Matters newsletters to clients and former clients, make them available in their waiting room, hand them out at seminars, and otherwise use them to get their name out.

"For lawyers, the best source of new business is your current and former clients," says Paul Boynton, publisher of Legal Matters. "Client newsletters encourage this business by keeping the lawyer 'top of mind,' enhancing the lawyer's reputation as an expert, and informing clients about reasons to see them that they might not have been aware of."

"Most lawyers are way too busy to create their own regular newsletter," says Boynton. "So we do it for them, and make it easy."

The Legal Matters newsletters have the law firm's name and contact information designed into them. They are produced in full color on high- quality paper stock. They also include an online version, which a law firm can add to its website or distribute via e-mail.

"Lawyers Weekly is dedicated to helping lawyers succeed, not just with information, but with marketing resources as well," says Boynton. "Legal Matters newsletters have been successful for us because they work for law firms."

Lawyers can learn more about Legal Matters by calling (800) 444-5297, x 8161, or visiting http://www.lawyersweekly.com/newsletters.

Lawyers Weekly, with its seven statewide legal newspapers as well as a national newspaper, a books division, four medical law reports, and three publications for in-house lawyers, is the nation's premier source of legal information for practicing attorneys. Lawyers Weekly leads the industry in integrating traditional newspaper products with a variety of other valuable services for lawyers.

It is a division of closely-held Dolan Media Company, based in Minneapolis, which operates daily and weekly law and business newspapers in 21 U.S. metro markets.

Source: Lawyers Weekly

CONTACT: Paul Boynton, Publisher of Lawyers Weekly, +1-617-218-8141,
paul.boynton@lawyersweekly.com

Web site: http://www.lawyersweekly.com/
http://www.lawyersweekly.com/newsletters


Free Blog/Web Site Counter  http://www.cohit.com/
Free counters for web sites and blogs. Fast, easy sign-up does not even require an email address. Several styles to choose from and they are easy to install with very little impact on your page's load time. Find out how your site or blog is really doing!

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. Admits Infringement, Forbidden to Sell Knock-off Flashlights

Mag Instrument Wins Judgments in Patent and Trademark Infringement Suits

Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. Admits Infringement, Forbidden to Sell Knock-off Flashlights

ONTARIO, Calif., Oct. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- Mag Instrument, Inc., the world's leading manufacturer of premium flashlights, today announced a legal victory in its patent and trademark infringement lawsuit against Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. The United States District Court in Los Angeles has entered a judgment against Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (Pink Sheets: DLTR) for infringement of a variety of patent and trademark rights owned by Mag Instrument, Inc.

The judgment, entered October 3, 2005, follows an earlier finding of patent infringement based on a summary judgment motion. The case progressed to the eve of trial, when Dollar Tree finally agreed to settle the case. The monetary terms of the settlement are confidential, but under the other terms of the settlement agreement, Dollar Tree Stores acknowledged the validity and infringement of Mag Instrument's patent and trademark rights. Dollar Tree Stores has also been enjoined from selling any infringing flashlights in the future and was additionally required to deliver to Mag Instrument over 120,000 of the infringing flashlights remaining in inventory so they could be destroyed.

Mag Instrument, located in Ontario, California, manufactures the Mag-Lite(R), Mag Charger(R), Mini Maglite(R) and Solitaire(R) flashlights. Mag Instrument is a U.S. manufacturer employing over 800 employees in the Los Angeles area, and is presently constructing a new 700,000 sq. ft. facility in Ontario, California which will ultimately increase the number of Mag Instrument employees to 2400. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. is a Virginia-based, publicly traded corporation that operates discount stores throughout the United States.

Dollar Tree sold hundreds of thousands of cheap, infringing copies of Mag Instrument's famous Mini Maglite(R) flashlight throughout the United States in its many retail stores. The fake aluminum flashlight copies were imported from China and looked just like the Mini Maglite(R) flashlight. Problematic to Mag Instrument was the fact that the quality of the knock-off flashlight was far below that of the Mini Maglite(R) flashlight, known not only for its unique design, but also for its reliability, durability and quality. Because the Dollar Tree Stores knock-off threatened Mag Instrument's invaluable reputation, it was very important to Mag Instrument to pursue Dollar Tree Stores.

The copying by Dollar Tree was not a unique scenario since companies have been trying to unfairly capitalize on the success of Mag Instrument's MagLite(R) brand of flashlights for over twenty years. However, Mag Instrument was surprised by the scope and brazenness of Dollar Tree's infringement. The victory against Dollar Tree Stores represents yet another in a long line of successfully resolved cases that Mag Instrument has had to file to enforce its patent and trademark rights against copiers. In another case filed against The Gillette Company, Mag Instrument alleged that The Gillette Company's distribution of a flashlight packaged with its Mach 3 Turbo Razor infringed its patent rights. Like the Dollar Tree Stores case, a judgment was recently entered against The Gillette Company which precluded it from further distributing the AA flashlights. Mag Instrument was represented in both cases by Robert C. Weiss and Mary A. Tuck of Jones Day in Los Angeles.

Source: Mag Instrument, Inc.

CONTACT: Tammy Taylor, or Joe Bunning, both of Sitrick And Company,
+1-310-788-2850, for Mag Instrument, Inc.


Free Blog/Web Site Counter  http://www.cohit.com/
Free counters for web sites and blogs. Fast, easy sign-up does not even require an email address. Several styles to choose from and they are easy to install with very little impact on your page's load time. Find out how your site or blog is really doing!

U.S. Legal Forms Releases New Bankruptcy Forms to Meet Requirements of 2005 Act

U.S. Legal Forms Releases New Bankruptcy Forms to Meet Requirements of 2005 Act

JACKSON, Miss., Oct. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- As a new federal bankruptcy law takes effect today, U.S. Legal Forms, Inc. (USLF) announces that it has updated bankruptcy form packages and official forms to comply with provisions of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.

(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20040519/CLW069LOGO )

USLF CEO Frank D. Edens says the 2005 Bankruptcy Act required that official forms be revised for use by bankruptcy courts. The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules together with the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States has adopted and approved the forms for use beginning October 17, 2005. USLF has converted the forms to fillable PDF and Word format for use by its customers.

"Because it is unclear exactly when individual bankruptcy courts will mandate use of the new forms, USLF continues to provide access to forms in effect before adoption of the 2005 Bankruptcy Act, in addition to the new forms," says Edens.

Bankruptcy courts are a division of the federal court system and each state has one or more federal bankruptcy courts, which implement bankruptcy laws. Edens says significant changes are expected as a result of recent reforms.

"The new legislation, in part, imposes tighter restrictions on who can file under Chapter 7. In addition to the new forms, we have articles and law summaries available on our website to help explain the changes," said Edens.

Revised bankruptcy forms are available for purchase on USLegalForms.com. Forms are designed to be downloaded and completed in Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat format. Bankruptcy packages include forms needed for filing a Chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy and relevant information and resources.

More information on the changes in bankruptcy law brought about by the 2005 Bankruptcy Act can be found by visiting USLegalForms.com.

About U.S. Legal Forms, Inc.

U.S. Legal Forms, Inc. (www.uslegalforms.com) is the nation's leading publisher of state-specific legal forms on the Internet. The company sells legal forms and related products to attorneys, small businesses, and the public. USLegalForms.com now lists more than 36,000 state-specific legal forms which are drafted in the required language and style needed to conform to the laws of each state. The production staff, comprised of attorneys, research and update legal forms to account for variations and revisions in state law. USLF products are designed to assist attorneys in conducting their business more efficiently and to help consumers with common and routine legal needs. U.S. Legal Forms, Inc. is a subsidiary of USLegal, Inc. (http://www.uslegal.com/), a legal publishing company which operates legal websites including Divorce.com, SearchLaw.com and LawStore.com

Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20040519/CLW069LOGO
AP Archive: http://photoarchive.ap.org/
PRN Photo Desk, photodesk@prnewswire.com

Source: U.S. Legal Forms, Inc.

CONTACT: Carrie Criado, Director of Public Relations of U.S. Legal Forms,
Inc., +1-601-825-3065 ext. 320, or fax, +1-601-825-2102, or
carrie@uslegalforms.com

Web site: http://www.uslegalforms.com/



Free Blog/Web Site Counter  http://www.cohit.com/
Free counters for web sites and blogs. Fast, easy sign-up does not even require an email address. Several styles to choose from and they are easy to install with very little impact on your page's load time. Find out how your site or blog is really doing!

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Beacon Legal Finance Announces First-of-Its-Kind Free Legal Funding Dictionary

Beacon Legal Finance Announces First-of-Its-Kind Free Legal Funding Dictionary

CHICAGO, Oct. 12 /PRNewswire/ -- Beacon Legal Finance has published a first-of-its-kind legal funding dictionary to help consumers better understand the technical aspects of pre-settlement funding. In pre-settlement funding, a plaintiff receives a cash advance in exchange for paying a portion of the future cash proceeds of the plaintiff's legal settlement. To understand this new type of consumer finance, plaintiffs need to be familiar with the terminology in both the legal and financial fields, but until now have been unable to find a single dictionary on the Internet that explained concepts and terms for both the law and finance.

To make the growing litigation finance market more transparent, Beacon Legal Finance has developed a free legal funding dictionary as a service to the consumer. A plaintiff may access the legal funding dictionary at the following link:

             http://www.beaconlegal.com/dictionary_search.asp        Here are some sample terms from the legal funding dictionary:        lawsuit, noun: (1) action brought in a court for the purpose of seeking relief from or remedy for an alleged wrong.  Also known as a "suit." Lawsuit funding example: a plaintiff can receive cash upfront from a pre-settlement funding company in exchange for selling a portion of the future cash proceeds of a lawsuit.  See pre-settlement funding, lawsuit funding, suit, lawsuit loan and lawsuit cash advance.        lawsuit loan, noun: (1) loan transaction between a plaintiff and a pre-settlement funding company where the plaintiff receives cash today in exchange for granting a lien on the cash proceeds of a lawsuit and paying interest and principal on the loan when the lawsuit resolves.  Lawsuit loan example: to receive a lawsuit loan from a lawsuit loan company, a plaintiff will need cooperation from the plaintiff's attorney.  See pre-settlement funding, loan, lawsuit funding, lawsuit loan and lawsuit cash advance.        loan, noun: (1) arrangement in which a lender gives money or property to a borrower and the borrower agrees to return the property or repay the money, usually along with interest, at some future point(s) in time. Usually, there is a predetermined time for repaying a loan, and generally the lender has to bear the risk that the borrower may not repay a loan. Lawsuit loan example: a plaintiff with a lawsuit may take out a loan where the plaintiff will receive cash upfront in exchange for granting a lien on the future cash proceeds of a lawsuit which will be used to pay principal and interest on the loan.  See pre-settlement funding, lawsuit funding, lawsuit loan, lend and lawsuit cash advance.      

Beacon Legal Finance is a leader in the litigation finance industry. Beacon Legal Finance is found at http://www.beaconlegal.com/. For questions about pre-settlement funding (also known as a lawsuit loan, lawsuit funding or lawsuit cash advance), call 888-723-2266.

   Contact:     James R. Pomposelli    Beacon Legal Finance    312-787-2390    james.pomposelli@beaconlegal.com    

This release was issued through eReleases(TM). For more information, visit http://www.ereleases.com/.

Source: Beacon Legal Finance

CONTACT: James R. Pomposelli, Beacon Legal Finance, +1-312-787-2390,
james.pomposelli@beaconlegal.com

Web site: http://www.beaconlegal.com/dictionary_search.asp
http://www.beaconlegal.com/


Free Blog/Web Site Counter  http://www.cohit.com/
Free counters for web sites and blogs. Fast, easy sign-up does not even require an email address. Several styles to choose from and they are easy to install with very little impact on your page's load time. Find out how your site or blog is really doing!

Google's Matt Cutts Interviewed by Aaron Wall

 

Google's Matt Cutts Interviewed by Aaron Wall
Search Engine Journal - USA
Aaron Wall of SEOBook.com got the chance to conduct an interview with Google's Matt Cutts, Google Search Engineer, about topics ranging from SEO, Spam, SEM ...

WordPress Selling Links -- But Using AdBrite Solves Search Engine ...
Search Engine Watch - USA
Average CPC & Selling Ad Space from Aaron Wall over at SEO Book looks at how WordPress is now selling text links on its home page for $10,000 per day via ...  

Free Blog Counter  
Free counters for web sites and blogs. Fast, easy sign-up does not even require an email address. Several styles to choose from and they are easy to install with very little impact on your page's load time. Find out how your site or blog is really doing!

Blogs vs. the law
Rocklin and Roseville Today - Rocklin,CA,USA
State College, Pa.-based blogger Aaron Wall was sued in August for defamation and revealing the trade secrets of Traffic-Power.com, a company that helps Web ...  

Cutts Up Against The Wall
WebProNews - Lexington,KY,USA
Over the weekend, Aaron Wall got a chance to talk to Google's "Mick Jagger of Search", Matt Cutts, in an in depth interview. The ...

Search Engine Journal » Google's Matt Cutts Interviewed by Aaron Wall
Aaron Wall of SEOBook.com got the chance to conduct an interview with Google's
Matt Cutts, Google Search Engineer, about topics ranging from SEO, Spam, SEM, ...

Google Auctions to Rival eBay and Yahoo?
Search Engine Journal - USA
... Aaron Wall of the SEOBook wonders how such an auction service from Google would effect its advertising model, Google AdWords, which includes mega advertising ...  
 

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Microsoft and RealNetworks Resolve Antitrust Case and Announce Digital Music and Games Partnership

Microsoft and RealNetworks Resolve Antitrust Case and Announce Digital Music and Games Partnership

New partnership brings Rhapsody(R) subscription service and RealNetworks' games to millions of Microsoft's MSN users

SEATTLE, Oct. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and RealNetworks, Inc. (NASDAQ:RNWK) today announced three agreements valued at $761 million to RealNetworks to settle their antitrust case and create a new partnership to innovate and promote consumer choices in digital music and games.

(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20000822/MSFTLOGO )

The three agreements include an agreement to resolve all the companies' antitrust disputes worldwide; an agreement for a wide-ranging digital music collaboration between the parties, including promotional and marketing support of Real's leading digital music subscription service, Rhapsody(R), on MSN properties; and an agreement to offer RealNetworks' digital games through MSN Games and Xbox Live Arcade for Xbox 360.

Under the music and games agreements, Microsoft is scheduled to pay Real $301 million in cash and provide services over 18 months in support of Real's product development, distribution, and promotional activities. Microsoft will earn credits at predetermined market rates to be applied to the $301 million for subscribers delivered to Real through MSN. Additionally, Real will take steps to support MSN Search, and Real and Microsoft will jointly promote use of Windows Media technologies with Rhapsody to Go.

The antitrust and technology assurance agreement resolves all antitrust disputes worldwide, based on a $460 million up-front cash payment to resolve all damages claims and a series of technology licenses and commitments under which Real will obtain long-term access to important Windows Media technologies that will enhance Real's media software solutions.

"Today we're closing one chapter and opening a new one in our relationship with Microsoft," said Rob Glaser, Founder and CEO of RealNetworks. "The legal chapter is being closed with an appropriate and fair outcome that sets the stage for a very productive and collaborative relationship between our companies. By integrating Real's premier music and games services into Microsoft's very popular MSN service, we will reach more consumers today and deliver even better products and services tomorrow."

"This agreement will provide MSN's millions of customers with easier access to subscription services for the music and games they love," said Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman and chief software architect. "Digital music is one of the fastest growing segments of the online entertainment industry, and by promoting Rhapsody's subscription music services from within MSN, we will provide a better experience for our users."

Music and Games Partnerships

Working together, Microsoft and Real will bring exciting new music experiences to consumers by featuring Rhapsody from within the MSN homepage, MSN Music, MSN Search, and MSN Messenger. The music collaboration agreement includes the following elements:

  -- MSN Messenger users will be able to share and play music while      chatting, from the library of over 1 million songs in Rhapsody, in a      convenient and legal way;   -- MSN Search will use Rhapsody's critically acclaimed music editorial      catalogue to help users find the music they love and to discover new      artists;   -- The two companies will jointly develop and implement a search      integration plan which will enable Real's customers to easily use MSN      Search within RealPlayer;   -- MSN Search will feature Rhapsody links to music in music related search      results;   -- The agreement enables Real to purchase advertising on MSN Search and on      the MSN Network to promote Rhapsody;   -- Both companies will promote the use of Windows Media portable devices      for use with Rhapsody to Go.  

Additionally, Microsoft and Real will collaborate in the casual games arena. Casual games has become a rapidly growing segment in digital entertainment and includes such games as the very popular Bejeweled(R) and SuperCollapse(R) as well as old favorites like Scrabble(R) and Solitaire. In this new games partnership, Real, a leading developer of casual games, will create a new subscription service to be offered on MSN Games and Real will also develop a series of new casual games for Xbox Live Arcade for Xbox 360.

Antitrust Settlement

Today's agreement includes a global settlement of all antitrust disputes, including the lawsuit brought by Real against Microsoft nearly two years ago in the United States and Real's participation in the proceedings initiated by the European Union and Korea. The agreement includes a variety of assurances regarding the design of the Windows operating system, including Windows Media Player, and access for Real to a broad range of Windows platform technologies. Among other things, Microsoft will provide Real expanded access and long-term licenses to a wide range of Windows Media and security technologies, that will enable Real to build services and software that enhance consumer's experience with Real's products and services and take advantage of innovations in Windows Vista. Under the agreement:

  -- Microsoft and Real will work together to enhance the functionality and      performance of Real's software products and services on the Windows      operating system.   -- Over time, Microsoft will develop and document additional Windows media      interfaces that will enable Real to build richer, secure media      experiences that take advantage of a broader set of media      functionalities throughout Windows.   -- Microsoft will enhance consumers' ability to access Real's software      products in simple and straightforward ways, enabling consumers easily      to choose their preferred settings for playing media files and managing      other media experiences.   -- Microsoft will design Windows Vista so that if a user seeks to play a      Real media file that has no playback software on the PC, Windows will      redirect the user who consents to a web page that enables the user to      download the Real software needed to play the Real media file.   -- Microsoft and Real will work together to enhance interoperability      between Microsoft's Windows Media and Real's Helix Digital Rights      Management systems. Microsoft will also enable Real to facilitate the      playback of content on non-Windows portable devices and personal      computers using Windows Media DRM.   -- Microsoft has provided Real contractual assurances ensuring Real broad      access to the PC OEM distribution channel.  

"This agreement ensures that Microsoft can innovate and that other media players can compete in a broad marketplace," said Brad Smith, senior vice president and general counsel at Microsoft. "We've resolved our disagreements from the past and put in place a foundation for collaboration in the future."

"Today's agreement is a significant achievement for our companies. In one stroke, we have fully resolved our outstanding antitrust claims and forged an alliance with a strong partner to deliver innovations in great new music and games to our customers," said Bob Kimball, senior vice president and general counsel at RealNetworks.

About Microsoft

Founded in 1975, Microsoft is the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.

About RealNetworks

RealNetworks, Inc. is the leading creator of digital media services and software including Rhapsody(R), RealPlayer 10, and casual PC and mobile games. RealNetworks has more than two million subscribers to its premium content subscription services. Consumers can access and experience audio/video programming and download RealNetworks' consumer software at http://www.real.com/. Broadcasters, network operators, media companies and enterprises use RealNetworks' products and services to create and deliver digital media to PCs, mobile phones and consumer electronics devices. RealNetworks' corporate information is located at http://www.realnetworks.com/company.

Forward Looking Statements: This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements relating to: (a) the parties' successful implementation of the agreements between them; (b) the enhancement of RealNetworks' services and software through access to Microsoft's technologies; (c) the future reach and quality of RealNetworks' products and services; (d) future access to services on MSN and the growth of digital music services; (e) the future quality of music services contemplated by the music agreement; (f) the creation of a new games subscription service and new casual games by RealNetworks; (g) the benefit to consumers from technical collaboration between Microsoft and RealNetworks; and (h) RealNetworks' access to the PC OEM distribution channel. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted include: risks relating to the timely development, production, marketing and acceptance of the products, services and technologies contemplated by the agreements between the parties; the development by Microsoft of new technology offerings and programs, and RealNetworks' ability to gain timely access to such offerings and programs; the timing of the launch of Windows Vista and other Microsoft products and services, and new RealNetworks products and services; consumer acceptance of RealNetworks' products and services; RealNetworks' ability to fully access and utilize the technology programs and licenses granted by Microsoft in a timely fashion to provide support for RealNetworks' consumer software and for integration of the parties' digital rights managements products; development and consumer acceptance of legal online music distribution services; the potential that RealNetworks will be unable to continue to enter into commercially attractive agreements with PC OEMs for the distribution of RealNetworks' consumer software; the emergence of new entrants and competition in the market for digital media subscription offerings; and competitive risks, including competing technologies, products and services.

More information about potential risk factors that could affect RealNetworks' business and financial results is included in RealNetworks' annual report on Form 10-K for the most recent year ended December 31, and its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and from time to time in other reports filed by RealNetworks with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and Windows Server are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. in the United States and/or other countries.

The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

RealNetworks, Helix, Rhapsody and RealPlayer are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc.

Photo: NewsCom: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20000822/MSFTLOGO
AP Archive: http://photoarchive.ap.org/
PRN Photo Desk photodesk@prnewswire.com

Source: Microsoft Corp.

CONTACT: Press: Jeremy Pemble, +1-206-892-6614 or jpemble@real.com, or
Financial: Caroline Hughes, +1-206-892-6718 or
carolinehughes@real.com, both
of RealNetworks; print and online media only: Rapid Response Team, Waggener
Edstrom, +1-503-443-7070 or
rrt@wagged.com, or global electronic media only:
Media Relations, Global Communications & Television, +1-212-339-9920 or
mediarelations@gctv.com, both for Microsoft; or financial analysts only:
Colleen Healy of Microsoft Investor Relations, +1-425-703-0597

Web site: http://www.microsoft.com/

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

In the fine tradition of Cyclamate, Saccharin, and Nutrasweet (Aspartame), Stevia, and now Splenda

Generation Green Asks California AG to Investigate Splenda Ads

EVANSTON, Ill., Oct. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Generation Green today sent a letter to California's Attorney General Bill Lockyer, urging an investigation of misleading advertising practices by Johnson & Johnson for its artificial sweetener Splenda.

Specifically, Generation Green says the advertising misleads consumers into believing that Splenda is a natural product, made from sugar. In fact, Johnson & Johnson does not even list sugar as an ingredient in Splenda. In the letter, Generation Green called on the state of California to take such steps that are necessary to halt Johnson & Johnson's misleading Splenda marketing campaign within the state and to require Johnson & Johnson to provide complete and accurate product information to California consumers.

Rochelle Davis, Executive Director, and Robert M. Brandon, Project Director, both of Generation Green, sent the following letter, dated Oct. 10, to California's Attorney General Bill Lockyer:

On behalf of Generation Green and thousands of member families concerned about the health and welfare of our children, I would vigorously echo the recent calls upon your office to begin an investigation into misleading advertising by Johnson & Johnson' s McNeil Nutritionals LLC for the artificial sweetener sucralose, which is sold under the brand-name Splenda.

Generation Green is a non-profit advocacy group comprised of parents and other concerned citizens who favor corporate and governmental policies that will allow children to grow up protected from exposure to toxins. We place great importance on protecting the consumer's right to know about chemical exposure, particularly related to food so that people are able to make informed decisions, especially with respect to their children's health.

The issue of Splenda advertising is of significant importance for California consumers, and indeed, for consumers across the country. Today, Splenda holds over a third of the sweetener market only six years after its approval as a food additive by the FDA in 1998. This remarkable growth is attributed to the perception that Splenda is natural and sugar-based. This perception is the direct result of Johnson & Johnson's intentional efforts to mislead consumers regarding the product. The slogan "made from SUGAR so it tastes like SUGAR," which is pervasive in Splenda print and broadcast advertising, seeks to mislead and confuse consumers into believing that Splenda is a natural product of sugar. It is a misleading claim.

  The facts are these:    * Splenda is a chemically created product in which sugar molecules are     manipulated through chlorination and other processes so as to be     completely unrecognizable as sugar.    * Following chlorination, a further chemical process is applied using     phosgene, a poisonous gas described by the Centers for Disease Control     as a major industrial chemical used to make plastics and pesticides.    * The Splenda label does not and cannot list sugar as an ingredient, as     sugar is not recognizable in the final product.  

The legal requirement of advertising substantiation -- that advertisers and ad agencies have a reasonable basis for advertising claims before they are disseminated -- is especially important when consumer health and safety is at issue, such as in a food additive like Splenda.

Nonetheless, Johnson & Johnson encourages consumer confusion by continually highlighting the word "sugar" in its advertising campaign, seeking to bolster the false association between Splenda and sugar in consumers' minds.

This is a dangerous development, as the product is quite clearly anything but natural.

Even more troubling, many of the Splenda ads focus on images of children; these ads convey the message that Splenda is a better, more natural product for children than other artificial sweeteners. These ads aim to encourage parents to provide or prepare food items for their children with Splenda. In one television commercial aired earlier this year, a child's voice says "Splenda and spice and everything nice. That's what little girls are made of." over video of children playing. This advertisement clearly equates Splenda with sugar (replacing "sugar" with "Splenda" in a common expression) and is intended to encourage the use of the product for children.

Moreover, Splenda's product expansion has focused on creating "low sugar" products like snack foods, breakfast cereals and soda -- indeed, Splenda is now an ingredient in many of the "convenience foods" that parents might give to their children, or that children might select for themselves.

Generation Green has been concerned for some time that this product expansion signals a clear intention by the Johnson & Johnson to target, not only parents, but also children, with its misleading Splenda advertising. That's why earlier this year Generation Green wrote to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission seeking a full investigation into Johnson & Johnson's Splenda advertising campaign.

In the absence of aggressive FTC action on this issue, it is vital that state offices like yours take up this issue on behalf of consumers. If, as there appears, the company has no basis for suggesting that Splenda and sugar are closely linked and equally natural products, we call upon the state of California to take such steps that are necessary to halt Johnson & Johnson's extensive Splenda marketing campaign within the state and to require Johnson & Johnson to provide complete and accurate product information to California consumers.

Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.

Source: Generation Green

CONTACT: Bob Brandon, Project Director of Generation Green,
+1-202-331-1550
http://www.generationgreen.org/


For more information:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2004-51%2CGGLD%3Aen&q=artificial+sweetners

 
 
 


Friday, October 07, 2005

Law Admissions Test Changes To Computer-Based Format

Law Admissions Test Changes To Computer-Based Format

Experts Provide Advice on Preparing for New LNAT

NEW YORK, October 6/PRNewswire/ -- Hunt-and-peck typing and eyestrain are two potential pitfalls for students taking the new computerized version of the National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT), according to experts at Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions, a global educational services leader who prepares students for the LNAT.

"For most British students, this will be the first computer-based test that they have encountered," said Louise Cook, European Operations Director, Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions. However, she noted, the LNAT's change from paper-and-pencil to a computerized format, announced earlier this year, is not without precedent, as several US admissions exams have made the shift. Current computer-based admissions tests include the Graduate Record Exam (GRE) for graduate school, the Graduate Management Admissions Test (GMAT) for business school, and the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) for medical school -- which just this summer announced it will change to a computer-based exam next year.

Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions last year helped more than 280,000 students prepare for standardised tests including the LNAT, BMAT, SAT and U.S. computer-based admissions exams. To tackle the new LNAT, Kaplan offers the following advice:

         - Learn how to type. The LNAT includes a 40 minute essay, which will be       typed. While the LNAT site assures "you should not be disadvantaged if       you are a slow typist," the ability to type with ten fingers rather       than two can only help in a timed test. You will have enough to worry       about without the added anxiety of finding letters on a keyboard under       timed conditions.      - Relax your eyes at regular intervals. One of the chief complaints from       students about computer-based tests is that they promote eye strain --       which becomes more pronounced as the test progresses. Make sure to       relax your eye muscles by looking at distant objects frequently.      - Deal with the easy questions first. The system lets you flag questions       for review so you can go back to unanswered or difficult questions.       Answering the easier questions first has two advantages -- it will keep       you from losing time getting too bogged down with difficult questions,       and will help you build the confidence which is vital to success.      - Keep abreast of current events. Your choice of essay topic will be       selected from one of five choices, and these options often relate to       current events or issues. How well-formed your argument is will       determine the calibre of your essay -- so the better versed you are in       topical issues, the stronger the knowledge base you will have to draw       upon to make your case. Read that Economist and Financial Times       regularly!      - Practice. Studies show that performance improves when tests are taken       more than once -- subsequently, scores improve with increased exposure       and familiarity with the content and format. Essay-writing skills in       particular, can be improved with practice -- notable as many LNAT test       takers last year struggled with the essay. Students can take the free       practice test available at http://www.lnat.ac.uk, and/or get three       practice tests, including a computer-based test simulating the test day       experience, extra practice essay questions, and an essay writing       workshop, through a Kaplan LNAT course. 

Universities that require the LNAT include: University of Birmingham, University of Bristol, University of Cambridge, Durham University, University of East Anglia, University of Glasgow, King's College London, Manchester Metropolitan University, University of Nottingham, University of Oxford and University College London.

Kaplan's LNAT courses, which run over two days, are designed to help students master the skills needed to succeed on these new multiple-choice format exams. The courses provide complete preparation including targeted instruction, in-depth content review and practice under exam-like conditions. Courses cover strategies for recognising common question types, identifying incorrect test answers, what to look for in the multiple-choice questions, developing an effective essay, making the most effective use of time during the test, stress management and other areas.

Kaplan courses are running at locations in London and Bristol. For more information, visit http://www.kaptest.com/uk

Established in 1938, Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions ( http://www.kaptest.com) has prepared generations of students for standardised entrance exams, including the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) required for application to most U.S. universities' law programmes. With 3,000 classroom locations worldwide, a comprehensive menu of online offerings and a complete array of books and software, Kaplan offers preparation for more than 60 standardised tests in the US, UK and Canada, including entrance exams for secondary school, college and graduate school, as well as English language and professional licensing exams. Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions also provides K12 services for schools.

Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions is a division of Kaplan, Inc. (http://www.kaplan.com), a leading provider of educational and career services for individuals, schools and businesses. Kaplan, Inc. also owns SCORE!, which offers after-school learning programs for young students; Kaplan Professional, which offers licensing and continuing education training and compliance tracking, including UK professional qualifications and business training through London's Financial Training Company; and Kaplan Higher Education, which offers post-secondary educational certificate and degree programs online and through 76 campus-based locations throughout the US and at the Dublin Business School. Kaplan also partners with Nottingham Trent University. Kaplan is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Washington Post Company (NYSE: WPO).

Press contact: Carina Wong, carina_wong@kaplan.com, +1-212-453-7571

         Web site: http://www.kaplan.com               http://www.kaptest.com/uk               http://www.lnat.ac.uk               http://www.kaptest.com  

Source: Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions

Carina Wong of Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions, +1-212-453-7571, carina_wong@kaplan.com NOTE TO EDITORS: Kaplan is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Washington Post Company (NYSE: WPO)

To see more releases from Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions, Click Here

This company's web site http://www.kaplan.com/

Fortune 1000 Spending on Outside Counsel Climbs 15.8%

Fortune 1000 Spending on Outside Counsel Climbs 15.8%

6 practices prime for double-digit growth in 2006

WELLESLEY, Mass., Oct. 6 /PRNewswire/ -- The BTI Consulting Group's (Wellesley, MA) fifth annual study of legal services reveals an impressive 15.8% rise in spending on outside counsel. BTI's exclusive analysis, based on over 1,000 interviews with corporate counsel at large and Fortune 1000 companies, estimates the total size of the market for outside counsel services at $47.2 billion.

Six specific practice areas stand out as top performers in this burgeoning marketplace, according to BTI's comprehensive research. Class Actions, Product Liability, General Litigation, Regulatory, Intellectual Property Litigation and Securities show strong signs of continued growth as well as high potential for premium billing rates. BTI's research finds pricing will be strongest in these areas as well.

"Clients have 40% smaller legal staffs and the stakes keep getting higher," reports Michael B. Rynowecer, BTI's President. "Most companies are sending much more work outside."

BTI's analysis also indicates that the growth in outside counsel spending has been accompanied by new demands on law firms. "Our eyes are on the growing gap between top performing law firms and those that are falling behind," Rynowecer continues. "There is a shake-out in our future," he predicts.

BTI's new market analysis, featured in its just-released publication, BTI Market Opportunities for Law Firms 2006, pinpoints the best opportunities for growth and premium billing rates. This forward-looking research highlights the practice areas, industries and specific client goals and needs that will capture the most legal dollars in 2006. It also delineates exactly which practice areas will see top growth and garner premium rates.

BTI Market Opportunities for Law Firms 2006, including a no-holds-barred analysis of law firm's financial and strategic performance, is available for purchase at BTI's website http://www.bticonsulting.com/ or by calling (617) 439-0333. BTI is the leader in providing high-impact strategic market research to law firms and the buyers and sellers of professional services.

Source: BTI Consulting Group

CONTACT: Michael B. Rynowecer of BTI, +1-617-439-0333,
mrynowecer@bticonsulting.com

Web site: http://www.bticonsulting.com/

St. Jude Medical Discovers Cosmic Radiation Can Affect Memory Chip in Limited Number of Older Generation ICDs

St. Jude Medical Discovers Cosmic Radiation Can Affect Memory Chip in Limited Number of Older Generation ICDs

ST. PAUL, Minn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 7, 2005--St. Jude Medical Inc. (NYSE:STJ) announced today that it has discovered that background levels of atmospheric ionizing cosmic radiation, more commonly known as cosmic rays, can affect a limited number of its older generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) products.

Although the incidence rate is low, and there have been no serious patient injuries or deaths reported to St. Jude Medical attributable to this anomaly, the Company is taking a conservative approach in advising the medical community and regulatory agencies.

Specifically, St. Jude Medical has identified through extensive investigation, including testing at an independent nuclear laboratory, that a particular vendor-supplied static random access memory (SRAM) chip can be affected, at a low frequency rate, by background levels of atmospheric ionizing cosmic radiation. A full copy of the physician communication, which includes a description of the anomaly and its related clinical risks, as well as St. Jude Medical's recommendations to physicians for patient monitoring, can be found at http://www.sjm.com/companyinformation/physicianletter.html.

This particular memory chip component was used in the following older generation St. Jude Medical ICDs:

-- Photon DR (Model V-230HV) (certain serial numbers)

-- Photon Micro VR/DR (Models V-194/V-232)

-- Atlas VR/DR (Models V-199/V-240)

To date, an incidence of only 0.00167 of the devices at issue (60 out of 36,000) have been found to have been affected by background levels of cosmic radiation. An estimated 26,000 of the device models remain in service. The estimated incidence of an anomaly of this type in the affected device models is 0.00257 over the five year projected life of the device.

"St. Jude Medical has taken a conservative, proactive approach in notifying the medical community of this anomaly," said Dr. Mark Carlson, Professor of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and a member of an independent panel of physicians that reviewed the issue for St. Jude Medical. Dr. Carlson also recently served as Chairman of a joint Policy Conference on Pacemaker and ICD Performance.

Among the information provided in the physician advisory is St. Jude Medical's recommendation that, if it is not already their practice, physicians should perform routine device monitoring every three months for patients with these devices. St. Jude Medical is also offering its remote monitoring product Housecall Plus(TM), where available, at no charge for models compatible with the remote monitoring system.

"Because the incidence associated with this anomaly is low, St. Jude Medical's recommendation for monitoring at three-month intervals will be appropriate for the vast majority of patients," said Dr. Bruce Wilkoff, director of cardiac pacing and tachyarrhythmia devices at The Cleveland Clinic and Heart Center and a member of the St. Jude Medical independent Medical Advisory Board.

As part of a new ICD product platform introduced in 2002, and prior to St. Jude Medical having any knowledge of this particular anomaly, St. Jude Medical began using a different vendor and a different design of the SRAM memory chip component. Laboratory testing and clinical experience indicate that this newer generation memory chip component does not share the same susceptibility to background cosmic radiation as the earlier generation. Consequently, other St. Jude Medical ICDs and all models of CRT-D devices, including the Atlas DR model V-242 and all Epic, Epic HF, Epic +, Epic + HF, Atlas + and Atlas + HF product families, are NOT affected by this issue.

Overall reliability information about the affected ICDs and other St. Jude Medical products can be found in the company's Product Performance Report on the St. Jude Medical web site at www.sjm.com.

St. Jude Medical has notified the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of this physician advisory. The FDA may determine this communication action to be a recall.

The Company does not expect this physician communication to have any material financial impact.

St. Jude Medical is dedicated to the design, manufacture and distribution of innovative medical devices of the highest quality, offering physicians, patients and payers outstanding clinical performance and demonstrated economic value.

Any statements made regarding the Company's anticipated future product launches, regulatory approvals, revenues, earnings, market shares, and potential clinical success are forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties, such as those described in the Financial Section of the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (see page 16). Actual results may differ materially from anticipated results.

Contacts
St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Laura Merriam, 651-766-3029 (Investor Relations)
or
Angela Craig, 651-481-7789 (Media Relations)

Wednesday, October 05, 2005

National Arbitration Forum Issues Two Decisions on Amazon Web Addresses

National Arbitration Forum Issues Two Decisions on Amazon Web Addresses

National Arbitration Forum arbitration panels rule in favor of Amazon.com, Inc., regarding several Internet domain names that were confusingly similar to the AMAZON.COM trademark.

MINNEAPOLIS, Oct. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- The National Arbitration Forum announced today that two rulings have been issued in favor of Amazon.com regarding the rights to 13 Internet domain names, including amazzone.com, amzaon.com, and amazln.com, among others.

Amazon.com, Inc., represented by Kevin M. Hayes, filed a complaint with the National Arbitration Forum on August 10, 2005 against the respondent Michele Dinoia c/o SZK.com. The complaint asserted legal rights to 12 Web addresses bearing close resemblance to those owned by Amazon.com, Inc.

Amazon.com's complaint questioned the legitimacy of the respondent's rights and interests in the domain names as well as the domain names' confusing similarity to Amazon.com's trademark. It also asserted that the respondent had registered and was using the domain names in bad faith, and was "a 'recidivist cybersquatter' with more than 20 reported decisions against it for conduct like that reflected in the Complaint in this proceeding," according to the decision authored by National Arbitration Forum panelists Terry F. Peppard, Paul A. Dorf, and Paul M. DeCicco.

Michele Dinoia c/o SZK.com defended the registration and use of one of the domain names, amazonne.com, by arguing that "ammazzone" is a generic Italian term, the equivalent of the generic English word "amazon," and not confusingly similar to Amazon.com's trademark. The three-member panel rejected this argument, declaring that "the translation of a mark into another language...does not defeat a claim of confusing similarity." The panel ordered all 12 domain names transferred to Amazon.com, Inc.

Amazon.com filed a separate complaint on August 9, 2005 asserting legal rights to amazln.com. A separate National Arbitration Forum panel found in favor of Amazon.com and ordered that domain name be transferred as well.

Thousands of Internet domain disputes similar to those of Amazon.com are heard each year by the National Arbitration Forum under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The domain name dispute process is a popular alternative to lengthy and expensive trademark lawsuits.

Copies of these decisions are available for viewing on the National Arbitration Forum website at: http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/536281.htm and http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/536549.htm .

About the National Arbitration Forum

The National Arbitration Forum is one of the world's leading providers of alternative dispute resolution solutions, including arbitration and mediation, representing a distinguished panel of over 1,500 attorneys and retired judges in the U.S. and in 29 countries. Founded in 1986, the National Arbitration Forum administers more than 50,000 cases annually. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the National Arbitration Forum also has offices located in New Jersey and Los Angeles. Additional information is available at the National Arbitration Forum's website at http://www.arbitration-forum.com/ .

Source: National Arbitration Forum

CONTACT: Kimberly Johnson of National Arbitration Forum,
+1-952-516-6478,
kjohnson@arb-forum.com

Web site: http://www.arbitration-forum.com/
http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/536281.htm
http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/536549.htm

Related Links

To see more releases from National Arbitration Forum, Click Here

This company's web site http://www.arbitration-forum.com/

Michigan Attorney General Cox Secures $15 Million for State from MCI-WorldCom

Michigan Attorney General Cox Secures $15 Million for State from MCI-WorldCom

Multistate Settlement Resolves Inquiry Into Tax, Accounting Practices

LANSING, Mich., Oct. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Attorney General Mike Cox announced today a $15 million settlement that Michigan, 14 other states, and the District of Columbia have entered into with MCI-WorldCom as payment of back taxes owed by the company to the Michigan Department of Treasury.

"Today's settlement will bring much-needed millions for Michigan without requiring the State to litigate numerous tax claims arising out of MCI- WorldCom's 2002 Chapter 11 bankruptcy," said Cox.

The settlement with the bankruptcy debtors of MCI-WorldCom concludes more than a year of negotiations between the parties. The agreement relates to taxes owed to the states from MCI-WorldCom, including taxes owed because of potential accounting errors and resulting bankruptcy claims arising from the company's Royalty Program. The states' position is that the accounting methods employed by the company's accountants, KPMG, allowed MCI-WorldCom to take deductions or add-backs from 1999 - 2001 not allowed under the states' tax laws.

Under the terms of the agreement, MCI-WorldCom will pay the participating states a lump sum of $315 million related to the Royalty Program by the end of October 2005, of which Michigan will receive approximately $10.2 million. In addition, Michigan will receive an additional $4.9 million by the end of October 2005 as a result of Department of Treasury audits for tax years before MCI's Royalty Program, bringing its total to $15,098,065. The settlement does not include an admission of wrongdoing from MCI-WorldCom.

Michigan joined Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin in the settlement, which was filed by MCI-WorldCom Tuesday in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. It is expected to be approved by the Court at an October 11 hearing and payment will be made shortly thereafter.

Source: Michigan Attorney General

CONTACT: Allison Pierce of Michigan Attorney General's office,
+1-517-373-8060

Web site: http://www.michigan.gov/ag

Related Links

To see more releases from Michigan Attorney General, Click Here

This company's web site http://www.ag.state.mi.us

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

GOOD luck tryin