AbdulJaami, PLLC and LegalMatch in David/Goliath Legal Battle
AbdulJaami, PLLC and LegalMatch in David/Goliath Legal Battle
( EMAILWIRE.COM, December 12, 2005 ) NEW YORK, NY, -- On November 8, 2005, Saboor H. AbdulJaami sued LegalMatch.com in Federal court (SDNY, case No. 05 CV 9464). In a 59 page complaint, Mr. AbdulJaami blasted LegalMatch, alleging, among other things, mail and wire fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentation.
According to Mr. AbdulJaami, a New York corporate lawyer, "This is the classic David versus Goliath story." While the plaintiff has limited resources, estimates of LegalMatch's annual revenues range in the tens of millions.
Mr. AbdulJaami, founder and Managing Member of AbdulJaami, PLLC, focuses his practice on international finance and is confident he can overcome the fierce attack LegalMatch is sure to mount. "Whether advising on international commercial transactions or Federal litigation, my firm's approach is to patiently employ intelligent analysis, thorough preparation and a willingness to burn the midnight oil to solve problems. This, coupled with our fierce commitment to excellence, allows us to prevail in the face of slim odds," said Mr. AbdulJaami.
ABOUT THE COMPANY: AbdulJaami, PLLC (www.shajlaw.com) is a law firm that helps structure, finance and close U.S. investments in Brazil's port infrastructure.
Contact:
AbdulJaami, PLLC
Saboor H. AbdulJaami, Esq.
Tel: 1.646.435.0668
( EMAILWIRE.COM, December 12, 2005 ) NEW YORK, NY, -- On November 8, 2005, Saboor H. AbdulJaami sued LegalMatch.com in Federal court (SDNY, case No. 05 CV 9464). In a 59 page complaint, Mr. AbdulJaami blasted LegalMatch, alleging, among other things, mail and wire fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentation.
According to Mr. AbdulJaami, a New York corporate lawyer, "This is the classic David versus Goliath story." While the plaintiff has limited resources, estimates of LegalMatch's annual revenues range in the tens of millions.
Mr. AbdulJaami, founder and Managing Member of AbdulJaami, PLLC, focuses his practice on international finance and is confident he can overcome the fierce attack LegalMatch is sure to mount. "Whether advising on international commercial transactions or Federal litigation, my firm's approach is to patiently employ intelligent analysis, thorough preparation and a willingness to burn the midnight oil to solve problems. This, coupled with our fierce commitment to excellence, allows us to prevail in the face of slim odds," said Mr. AbdulJaami.
ABOUT THE COMPANY: AbdulJaami, PLLC (www.shajlaw.com) is a law firm that helps structure, finance and close U.S. investments in Brazil's port infrastructure.
Contact:
AbdulJaami, PLLC
Saboor H. AbdulJaami, Esq.
Tel: 1.646.435.0668
Media Advisory -- Microsoft And Google Both Claim Victory In Court Battle Over Dr. Lees Employment
Appellate expert with experience in similar non-compete issues available to comment on judges ruling and next steps
( EMAILWIRE.COM, September 14, 2005 ) LOS ANGELES, CA The clash of the titans in Microsoft v. Google sees both sides claiming a win in the wake of Judge Steven Gonzalezs decision in King County Superior Court today. While Judge Gonzalez enjoined Dr. Kai-Fu Lee from undertaking a broad range of activities for Google, he allowed him to proceed with a major role in Googles China enterprise. Robin Meadow, one of Californias leading appellate attorneys and a partner in the appellate boutique Greines, Martin, Stein and Richland LLP, is available to provide an informed perspective on the seemingly incongruous claims of victory by both Microsoft and Google.
Did Microsoft accomplish its goal in the Washington court and, if so, what is Googles next step? What happens now to the case it filed in Santa Clara Superior Court that was removed to the federal court? Meadow argued a similar non-compete case before the California Supreme Court in Advanced Bionics Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc., and has been following this case closely.
Contact:
Casey Sayre & Williams
Anne Sage
Tel: 310 396-2400
Appellate expert with experience in similar non-compete issues available to comment on judges ruling and next steps
( EMAILWIRE.COM, September 14, 2005 ) LOS ANGELES, CA The clash of the titans in Microsoft v. Google sees both sides claiming a win in the wake of Judge Steven Gonzalezs decision in King County Superior Court today. While Judge Gonzalez enjoined Dr. Kai-Fu Lee from undertaking a broad range of activities for Google, he allowed him to proceed with a major role in Googles China enterprise. Robin Meadow, one of Californias leading appellate attorneys and a partner in the appellate boutique Greines, Martin, Stein and Richland LLP, is available to provide an informed perspective on the seemingly incongruous claims of victory by both Microsoft and Google.
Did Microsoft accomplish its goal in the Washington court and, if so, what is Googles next step? What happens now to the case it filed in Santa Clara Superior Court that was removed to the federal court? Meadow argued a similar non-compete case before the California Supreme Court in Advanced Bionics Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc., and has been following this case closely.
Contact:
Casey Sayre & Williams
Anne Sage
Tel: 310 396-2400
posted by (hris at 8:48 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home